Chiefly Product

Chiefly Product

Where Would We Be Without AI?

Not in the future - right now...

Craig Unsworth's avatar
Craig Unsworth
May 12, 2026
∙ Paid

The invisible dependency problem

Most leaders still talk about AI as if it has just arrived. A new capability. A new wave. Something to “adopt”. But that framing is already outdated.

We haven’t just entered the AI era. We’ve been building on top of it for decades. Quietly. Incrementally. Often invisibly. And that creates a blind spot.

Because if you stripped AI out of the last 70 years of progress, large parts of modern business wouldn’t just slow down. They would stop working.

AI isn’t a layer we’re adding. It’s a foundation we’ve already built on.

black and white polka dot pattern

The obvious gap: productivity collapses

Let’s start with the bit everyone can feel. Remove AI from today’s workflows and the immediate impact is brutal.

  • No copilots, no agents, no intelligent automation

  • No fast synthesis of large volumes of information

  • No scalable content generation, coding acceleration, or research augmentation

What happens next is not subtle. Engineering velocity drops. Content teams slow down. Analysis takes longer, and often becomes shallower. Decision-making stretches out because the time to insight increases.

In portfolio terms, this is where it lands hardest:

  • FTEE moves backwards, not forwards

  • Teams need to re-expand to deliver the same output

  • Cost bases increase, while speed decreases

You don’t just lose efficiency, you lose competitiveness.


The less obvious gap: systems start to break

This is where it gets more interesting.

Because the real dependency on AI isn’t just in the tools we use day to day. It’s embedded in the systems we take for granted. Take AI away, and a number of “normal” capabilities degrade quickly:

  • Search becomes less relevant and less useful

  • Recommendation systems lose accuracy and impact

  • Fraud detection weakens, increasing risk and loss

  • Pricing and risk models become cruder

  • Logistics and routing become less efficient

These things don’t disappear entirely, but they become:

  • Slower

  • Less accurate

  • More expensive to operate

And that matters, because many modern business models rely on those systems being highly effective. When they aren’t, the economics start to wobble.


grayscale photo of statue of man

The second-order effects: entire markets look different

Now zoom out… If AI had not been quietly advancing over the last 70 years, we wouldn’t just see slower companies. We would see different markets.

  • Fewer winner-takes-most platforms, because personalisation and optimisation are weaker

  • Less effective digital advertising, which underpins a huge proportion of the internet economy

  • Slower evolution of data-driven SaaS businesses

  • More reliance on human-heavy operating models

For Private Equity, and investor-backed businesses, this is particularly relevant. A significant proportion of value creation over the past 15 to 20 years has been driven by:

  • Data leverage

  • Operational efficiency

  • Scalable delivery models

All of which are strengthened by AI foundations. Remove those, and:

  • Margins are thinner

  • Growth is slower

  • Defensibility is weaker

Many investment theses simply don’t hold in the same way.


Yellow caution tape with "do not cross" text

Have we already crossed the line? (Yes)

This is the part most organisations haven’t fully internalised…

We are no longer deciding whether to adopt AI. We are already dependent on it. The question is not “Should we use AI?”, it’s “Are we keeping pace with a dependency we already have?”

Because if you’re not, you’re not standing still. You’re falling behind a baseline that has already moved.


What this means for leaders

This is where it becomes practical. If AI is already embedded in how modern businesses operate, then:

  • Ignoring it is not a neutral decision

  • Delaying it is not a low-risk strategy

  • Dabbling in it is unlikely to be enough

Meanwhile:

  • Competitors are compounding capability daily

  • Teams are learning how to combine human judgement with machine speed

  • Entire workflows are being redesigned around what is now possible

The gap doesn’t grow linearly. It compounds. Which means the cost of inaction compounds too. The shift to human+machine is not a future state. It is the current baseline. And the organisations that recognise that earliest tend to move fastest.

Read more about this compounding effect here…

The Compounding Cost of Waiting on AI

The Compounding Cost of Waiting on AI

Craig Unsworth
·
Mar 10
Read full story

Paid Subscriber Exclusive

AI Dependency Audit: Where Would Your Business Break First?

If AI is already embedded in your business, the most useful question you can ask is:

Where are we already dependent - and where are we not yet taking advantage?

A simple way to approach this is through a 3x3 lens…

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Craig Unsworth.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Chiefly Product Ltd · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture